Which smartphone is better: HTC Incredible S vs Samsung Galaxy vs HTC Desire HD?

Hey guys,
like many people I’m thinking about export a smartphone sometime soon. My needs for the smartphone are a excellent processor (not neceserilly dual-core) a excellent bright show, a solid feel and an Anroid OS. I will be by my smartphone mainly for surfing the web and by Apps.

I have lessened down my search to the following phones:

HTC Incredible S (first choice so far)
+excellent screen size, Solid feel in the hand, HTC sense UI, nice effect of the touchsensative buttons when you turn the phone to horizontal mode… (and everything else you would come to expect from the latest smartphones
-I don’t really see the need for the high price due to its not yet updated version of Android (2.3) yet, battery life a bit small

Samsung galaxy I9000 S (second choice so far)

+ Super AMOLED screen is pretty incredible, really excellent price for such a high-end phone, fantastic speed (after tuning it abit)… (and everything else you would come to expect from the latest smartphones)

- Cheap plasticy feel to it, TouchWiz no way near as striking as HTC Sense, tries too hard to copy the looks of an iPhone

HTC Desire HD

+Basically all the Pro’s of the Incredible S

-Screen a tad too large for my likings

Answer by Pjay
The HTC EVO 4G.

Solid feel, Sense UI.

Also, why not point out that Samsung hasn’t yet got Froyo on the Galaxy line if you’re kvetching about Gingerbread not being on the HTC models?

Answer by Ramos Gonzalvez
Samsung Galaxy S II
check specs here: http://techjungle.info/samsung-i9100-galaxy-s-ii-specifications/

Answer by ANDROID
Hi.i would say the Galaxy S is the best choice to go with.

Give your answer to this question below!

Hi all, I am looking for a excellent phone that has excellent processing speed and latest feature. Options that i found are Nokia x6 8gb, samsung galaxy, htc. I am not able to choose that should i go for android or symbain. Nokia x6 seems excellent to me but i am not sure about how is routine (processing time) of this phone.

Any suggestions ? Which phone should i go for within affordable price (<15k). (Phone should at-least has 5MP with sparkle and Wifi.)

Answer by Umair
symbian is outdated compared to android
Android is ahead of everyone if you look at the features it offers
i would go with the galaxy
very nice phone, huge screen with super amo led screen, super quick processor, and HD camera and HD playback.

Symbian was the software back in 2004-05
android is now and the future.

Answer by ANDROID
Hi. Just let me say this…..android is simply the best. Get a nice android phones. Galaxy S is a very standard phone. HTC makes some brilliant phones. I’ve owned a HTC G1 for a long time now & still like it.

Give your answer to this question below!
Samsung Droid Charge authoritative for Verizon at steep 0
Verizon now set a new price ceiling for non-iPhone devices by launching its second 4G phone, the Samsung Droid Charge. The new flagship phone uses the same LTE to hit an average 5-12Mbps in download speeds but focuses most on its image quality. It packs a 4.3-inch Super AMOLED Plus screen that’s sharper and simpler to see outdoors than others and also comes with both an eight-megapixel back …
Read more on MacNN

Arkon SM-ARMBAND Sports Armband for iPhone, BlackBerry, HTC, Samsung and Motorola

• Clear plastic take in allows touch screen access
• Adjustable velcro strap
• Water strong sweat proof material
• Additional storage pouch for ID, cash and keys
• Insightful material for night time activity

Arkon’s SM-ARMBAND is the perfect belt for the active Smartphone user. Impeccably compatible with all iPhone’s including the iPhone 4, Sprint EVO 4G, Samsung Galaxy S and other Android, BlackBerry and Windows Mobile Smartphones. The SM-ARMBAND features a clear protective screen allowing access to your phones touch screen while in the SM-ARMBAND and water strong nylon material with adjustable Velcro straps to comfortably fasten your Smartphone to your bicept. Insightful material on the SM-

List Price: $ 14.95

Price: Too low to show